|
|||||||
| |||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
Viral Marketing - not a dirty word -
22-05-2008, 05:10 PM
Can someone tell me why companies are still spending a ongiong fortune on interruptive web adverts which only seem to irritate the potential customers with an average 0.5% clickthrough, when a well directed viral campaign can deliver up to a 50% click through with no ongoing markleting spend after the initial pend layout?
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Re: Viral Marketing - not a dirty word -
27-05-2008, 11:16 AM
Wth Yahoo and Alta Vista (popular ones) charging about £10-£25 cmp for a minimum impression of 100,000 you will be looking at paying about £1000-£2500
a month.. For what? A one way conversation which may or may not catch your targets eye. My argument is to create content that your user WANTS to interact with, which has been seeded in a targeted campaign, and for an immersive communication to begin. And that does not mean a half baked Whack a mole game with your brand stuck on it in a vain attempt to grab the attention, its about strategic content. strategically placed and immersive to the point that they wish to share it with their peers - thus marketing it for you , pre-approving it as they send it onwards exponentially. |
|
|||
|
Re: Viral Marketing - not a dirty word -
27-05-2008, 12:33 PM
tis true that a poorly produced and poorly seeded campaign can fall short, but it is also true that a well thought out and strategically targeted campaign can save you in the long run in marketing spend.
Example: Recent campaign created for £25k with a fixed £5k seeding strategy, had, in only one month , 1.8million people interacting with the advertainment, not view but interact.. with 300,000 click through (17% CRT) and from there increasing clients sign ups by 900%. I know there is a lot of poor marketing which is masquerading under the guise of viral,and this is the bane of my life. Strapping a send a friend mechanism to my latest pinched loaf doesn't make it viral. Yes you need to tell the world, but isn't it better to tell them in a format that they can best hear about it.....and not, as used by television marketers, by cutting a film you want to watch into pieces thus interrupting their viewing pleasure |
|
||||
|
Re: Viral Marketing - not a dirty word -
17-06-2008, 05:10 PM
I think the term 'viral' is being used loosely these days.
If the product or service offered has the buzz in it already, it's bound to generate the CTR you're looking for. If on the other hand that's not the case, having the greatest viral marketing strategy in the world won't do much. It's conversion that's important I reckon. It doesn't matter if a zillion people click to view a site / online ads; if they don't register because the product hasn't got the 'buzz' in it, something of value, then it ain't worth it. I'm thinking of the Nike+ (iPod recording device + shoes to graph out your marathon running progress) and everything they've put into it; now that's buzz. People talk about it. Same as the iPhone... If you're selling the same broadband service; with a similar monthly payment; doesn't matter how much viral marketing campaigns you do; it'll be fun; but not sure it'll be effective. My 2p. Elie aka bubblewrap |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Viral Marketing – Making The Most Out Of Web 2.0 | Scott-scd | Internet Marketing Forum | 2 | 31-08-2007 03:27 PM |