Thanks for the review fiscx! Your comments are really interesting and non-intuitive! Let's discuss them..
We designed the page by purpose to stand out, and look different. We thought that the cartoonist design might make SafeTok & online authentication easier to understand and might make it much more fun & memorable than the traditional corporate style. Do you think this was not a good idea?
Also, I am really surprised that you find it unclear from the first page what we are offering. I always thought that it gives a good overview. I would be really grateful if you could let me know how to improve & make it more clear/understandable, what you think is missing and what important details are hidden away.
Regarding the demo page, adding a dummy account is probably a good idea. There might however be some problems since users might decide to protect the dummy account with their device in which case no one else will be able to access it. So arranging for it might be tricky. I am quite surprised that you didn't get to sign up so - we tried to make it as easy as possible - all you need to enter is your desired username & password.
Your remark regarding contact details is very interesting indeed. I never thought that anyone might consider the page a phishing page since it does not request any personal data whatsoever - so it can't possibly do phishing (if a webmaster decides to implement SafeTok, his webpage will still do the username & password check, SafeTok will only do the device & fingerprint check.). What kind of contact data would you expect? Contact e-mail address? Phone Nr? Address? Company name?
Please remember though that provision of contact details & being a phishing website are absolutely unrelated.
Phishing websites often look like the real website and even provide the true contact details, so it is not a good way to be sure that a website is authentic
